Following up on our post about security strategy, we’re going to take a focus on executive communication. Security leaders frequently encounter advice on how to present to boards, with general tips like "limit metrics," "tell stories," and "find your security champion." While these pointers can be helpful, the details of how, actual frequency, and especially board fails are very rarely widely discussed.
There’s a few reasons behind these gaps. Board communication is in fact hard in reality. It can sometimes be chaotic and stressful, especially for new or blossoming executives. And success sells, fails don’t.
Board communication is notoriously challenging, often chaotic, and stressful, especially for those new to the role.
Presentation is incredibly important, whether your audience is the Board of Directors, Executive Board, or Management Team. The reality is that CISOs are often ill equipped when thrust into their first or continuing Board sessions, with as many as 60% operating normally in “Junior” executive positions. Security leaders need to learn “on the fly”. Conversely, Cyber as a subject is appropriately receiving more and more exposure relevant to rising regulation and risk. This presents a great opportunity to advance security. Typically, a first Board security session happens in a “honeymoon period”. Like anything in business however, every opportunity always must be followed by execution.
With the average CISO tenure potentially at 2.3 years, a hidden factor in effectiveness and length of engagement is how well a leader might be able to hold his/her own in the wider corporate context. So let’s dive into changing Regulation and expectations in Europe, why performance at the Board matters, and best practices and resources available to security leaders.
In 2024, the engagement of CISOs with company boards continues to vary globally. Notably, around 50% of CISOs engage with their boards at least quarterly, though 25% report an ad hoc relationship or no engagement at all. This marks a slight improvement from 2022, where 61% of CISOs reported to the full board and 43% reported to both the board and a committee.
In the EU and Switzerland, regulatory developments are pushing boards attention to cybersecurity. The EU’s NIS2 Directive mandates stricter cybersecurity measures and reporting requirements, making compliance a board-level concern. In Switzerland, FINMA’s Circular 2023/1 introduces new requirements for managing operational, ICT, and cyber risks, further underscoring the importance of board oversight in these areas - specifically indicating that an organization’s Board of Directors approve ICT and cyber risks once per year. An Executive Board must receive reports from risk functions at least twice per year.
These changes have led to the creation of board-level cybersecurity committees and a growing emphasis on regular updates from CISOs. The shift is further evident in the growing percentage of board members with cybersecurity experience or exposure. This is still an area that needs further development, particularly in non-tech sectors.
Typically, a CISO or security-focused board briefing may last anywhere from 15-45 minutes, with general board expectations being oversight of risk, staying informed, and a brief overview of strategy or programme status. Ultimately, an overall expectation is a strong degree of “executive presence”, of which both people new to the experience as well as seasoned executives need to learn and further develop.
The relationship between a Board of Directors and security leadership is critical to the success of an organization's security program. Often, a CISO is given the opportunity to present a 90-day plan or strategy early in their tenure, setting the tone for future interactions. This initial engagement is crucial, as it establishes trust, sets expectations, and influences the frequency and context of future updates. The strength of this relationship impacts several key areas:
Perhaps most importantly, board support can significantly enhance a CISO's ability to implement security policies and foster a security-focused culture within the organization. A poorly managed Executive-Board relationship can devolve into a loss of trust and paralyzing relationship. Without this support, security initiatives may face resistance, and the CISO's effectiveness—and tenure—may be compromised.
Based on our experience preparing for and presenting to Boards, here are some fundamental concepts to keep in mind:
References:
Savanti, Heidrick, Globalnewswire, Iansresearch, Practiceguides, Researchgate, McKinsey, Noobpreneur
Want to know more? Reach out to us for practical and hands-on guidance tailored for your needs.
Legal Notice - Impressum
Christian Ulmer
CySafe GmbH
Gewerbestrasse 10
Switzerland - 6330 Cham
UID: CHE-264.758.603